How does the authors' use of language in paragraph 2 of the article "Cameras in the Courtroom" and paragraph 1 of the article "Challenging the Status Quo" convey DIFFERENT tones?

Question

*
The phrase "supported the ban" in "Cameras in the Courtroom" expresses a pleased tone, while the phrase "stuck in old ways" in "Challenging the Status Quo" contributes to a frustrated tone.
The phrase "defendants would get nervous" in "Cameras in the Courtoom" expresses a concerned tone, while the phrase "a closed loop" in "Challenging the Status Quo" indicates an explanatory tone.
The phrase "jurors would be distracted" in "Cameras in the Courtroom" contributes to a scornful tone, while the phrase "Everyone should be" in "Challenging the Status Quo" suggests an arrogant tone.
The phrase "All these factors" in "Cameras in the Courtroom" develops an analytical tone, while the phrase "better way of functioning" in "Challengin the Status Quo" builds a hopeful tone.

Answer 1

The correct option is:

The phrase "supported the ban" in "Cameras in the Courtroom" expresses a pleased tone, while the phrase "stuck in old ways" in "Challenging the Status Quo" contributes to a frustrated tone.

This comparison highlights how language can shape the emotional response conveyed by each author, with one expressing satisfaction and the other frustration.