In the article "Cameras in the Courtroom," the use of phrases such as "supported the ban" conveys a pleased tone, suggesting approval of the decision to restrict camera access in court. This positive language reflects a sense of reassurance about the traditional courtroom setting. Additionally, the concern expressed through "defendants would get nervous" indicates an empathetic perspective towards the defendants, further enhancing the tone of caution regarding the presence of cameras. The phrase "jurors would be distracted" introduces an element of ridicule, implying a lack of seriousness in jurors' duties when faced with cameras, which contributes to a scornful tone. Overall, the language used in this paragraph reflects a tone that favors maintaining existing judicial practices and highlights perceived risks.
Conversely, in "Challenging the Status Quo," the phrase "stuck in old ways" denotes a frustrated tone, suggesting dissatisfaction with resistance to change and a desire for progress. The expression "a closed loop" conveys an explanatory tone, hinting at the limitations of entrenched practices and the need for reform. Meanwhile, the phrase "Everyone should be" projects an arrogant tone, implying that the author believes their viewpoint is self-evident and that others should agree without question. The mention of "better way of functioning" introduces a hopeful tone, indicating optimism about potential improvements and innovations in the system. Overall, the language in this paragraph conveys a sense of urgency and advocacy for change, contrasting sharply with the cautious and traditionalist tone found in the previous article.
Together, the different uses of language in these paragraphs showcase the authors’ distinct attitudes towards their subjects—one leaning towards preservation of existing norms, while the other pushes for progressive change.
1 answer