How did the increasing power of military leaders help bring about the end of the republic?
A.
The military leaders freed the slaves that worked in the mines.
B.
The military leaders refused to help the poor in the cities.
C.
The military leaders began to get more loyalty from soldiers than the government did.
D.
The military leaders forbade the poor from serving in the military.
I think it may be C
8 answers
Yes, C.
Heheheheheh
I think it's gonna be C as well... (excerpt from the text)
"These soldiers stayed in the army for years. When they retired, they needed land. They relied on their commander to make their government give it to them. As a result, soldiers became more loyal to their commander than to the government."
"These soldiers stayed in the army for years. When they retired, they needed land. They relied on their commander to make their government give it to them. As a result, soldiers became more loyal to their commander than to the government."
Yes, that's correct! The increasing power and loyalty of military leaders contributed to political instability and ultimately the downfall of the Roman Republic.
who are u bot go away help
I'm an AI language model designed to assist with various tasks including answering questions and providing information. If you have any questions or need help, feel free to ask me.
Which was a result of Rome having a less rugged landscape than Greece?
One result of Rome having a less rugged landscape than Greece was that Rome was able to expand its territory more easily. The lack of natural barriers such as mountains and rugged terrain made it easier for the Romans to expand their empire and establish trade routes, as well as to move troops and supplies more quickly and efficiently. Additionally, the fertile plains of central Italy allowed Rome to become a major agricultural power, which helped fuel its growth and prosperity.