How did Florida change after the end of the French and Indian War? Select all that apply.

1. Britain gained control of the territory from spain
2. West florida developed at a much faster rate than other parts of the state
3. slavery was permitted to entice southerners to settle
4. the territory was divided into four distinct territories: north, south, east, and west

11 answers

After the end of the French and Indian War, Florida underwent significant changes. The following statements are accurate:

  1. Britain gained control of the territory from Spain - Following the war, the Treaty of Paris (1763) resulted in Spain ceding Florida to Britain, marking a significant shift in control.

  2. Slavery was permitted to entice southerners to settle - After British control was established, slavery was permitted, which aimed to attract more southern settlers.

The other statements:

  1. West Florida developed at a much faster rate than other parts of the state - This statement is somewhat misleading as development rates varied, but West Florida did benefit from British policies encouraging settlement.

  2. The territory was divided into four distinct territories: north, south, east, and west - This is not accurate as Florida was not divided this way immediately after the war. Instead, it was administered as a single British colony with later divisions occurring.

Thus, the correct changes are 1 and 3.

In the text you read this about the aftermath of the Boston Massacre: The soldiers were arrested and tried in court. John Adams agreed to defend them, saying that they deserved a fair trial. He wanted to show the world that the colonists believed in justice, even if the British government did not. At the trial, Adams argued that the crowd had provoked the soldiers. His arguments convinced the jury. In the end, the heaviest punishment any soldier received was a branding on the hand. Question Use the excerpt to answer the question. How could John Adams defend the British soldiers but still be seen as a Patriot? (1 point) Responses Adams knew that many Patriots wanted the British soldiers to be set free. Adams knew that many Patriots wanted the British soldiers to be set free. Adams defended the soldiers because many Patriots asked him to. Adams defended the soldiers because many Patriots asked him to. Adams defended the soldiers while defending the Patriots' belief in justice. Adams defended the soldiers while defending the Patriots' belief in justice. Adams defended the soldiers because he thought it would make the British pity the Patriot cause.

The most accurate response based on the excerpt is:

Adams defended the soldiers while defending the Patriots' belief in justice.

This reflects John Adams' commitment to the principles of justice and fair trials, which he believed were essential even when it involved defending British soldiers. His actions demonstrated that the colonists valued the rule of law, aligning with the ideals of the Patriot cause.

“Our Colonies must be the biggest Beggars in the World, if such small Duties appear to be intolerable Burdens in their Eyes.” —“Pacificus,” Maryland Gazette, March 20, 1766 Question Use the excerpt to answer the question. This excerpt is from a citizen in England in response to the colonial outrage toward the Stamp Act. What central argument of the American colonists against the Stamp Act is not understood by the writer? (1 point) Responses that trade was heavily restricted due to the taxes, which made it difficult for the colonists to make enough money to live let alone pay the taxes that trade was heavily restricted due to the taxes, which made it difficult for the colonists to make enough money to live let alone pay the taxes that although the tax is small, it is the idea that the colonists have to repay the British government for a war they did not support that is unjust that although the tax is small, it is the idea that the colonists have to repay the British government for a war they did not support that is unjust that it is not the amount of tax that is the problem but rather the fact that the colonists were not involved in passing the tax that it is not the amount of tax that is the problem but rather the fact that the colonists were not involved in passing the tax that the tax may seem small to those in England but for the American colonists it is a very large amount of money that the tax may seem small to those in England but for the American colonists it is a very large amount of money

The central argument of the American colonists against the Stamp Act that is not understood by the writer is:

that it is not the amount of tax that is the problem but rather the fact that the colonists were not involved in passing the tax.

This response captures the essence of the colonial grievance, which was rooted in the principle of "no taxation without representation." The writer fails to grasp that the colonists' objection was more about their lack of representation in the decision-making process regarding the tax, rather than the tax's size itself.

Why did the British feel justified imposing the Stamp Act on the colonists? Select all that apply. (1 point) Responses British citizens living in England faced increased taxes due to wars in the colonies. British citizens living in England faced increased taxes due to wars in the colonies. The taxes protected colonists living in the Ohio River valley from Native Americans. The taxes protected colonists living in the Ohio River valley from Native Americans. Britain had spent money protecting colonists from the French. Britain had spent money protecting colonists from the French. The taxes were being used to raise money for more supplies for the colonists.

The British felt justified imposing the Stamp Act on the colonists for the following reasons:

  1. British citizens living in England faced increased taxes due to wars in the colonies. - The British government believed that since the colonies benefited from British military protection, they should share in the costs.

  2. Britain had spent money protecting colonists from the French. - The expense incurred during the French and Indian War, which was fought largely to protect colonial interests, led the British to impose taxes to recoup some of those costs.

The other two options regarding protecting colonists living in the Ohio River valley from Native Americans and raising money for more supplies for the colonists do not generally represent the justification given for the Stamp Act. Therefore, only the first two statements are correct.

Why were colonial minutemen so prepared for the arrival of the British in Concord? Select all that apply. (1 point) Responses When Washington saw the British, he fired three canon shots sending a warning signal. When Washington saw the British, he fired three canon shots sending a warning signal. Paul Revere had warned villages that the redcoats were coming. Paul Revere had warned villages that the redcoats were coming. The Green Mountain Boys hid in the bushes and warned the Continental Army. The Green Mountain Boys hid in the bushes and warned the Continental Army. When the British headed out, Americans hung two lamps as a warning signal.

The colonial minutemen were well-prepared for the arrival of the British in Concord for the following reasons:

  1. Paul Revere had warned villages that the redcoats were coming. - Paul Revere's midnight ride was instrumental in alerting the colonial militias and villagers about the British advance.

  2. When the British headed out, Americans hung two lamps as a warning signal. - The use of lanterns (one if by land, two if by sea) to signal the British movement was part of the warning system in place to prepare the colonists.

The other options regarding Washington firing canon shots and the Green Mountain Boys hiding in the bushes are not accurate in this context. Washington was not present at Concord; his involvement came later, and the Green Mountain Boys were active in other areas, primarily in Vermont, rather than in the events at Concord. Therefore, the correct responses are 1 and 4.

Compare the tactics used by the French troops in the French and Indian War with those of the American patriots during the Revolution. (4 points)

The tactics used by the French troops in the French and Indian War and those of the American patriots during the Revolutionary War were influenced by their respective contexts, resources, and objectives. Here’s a comparison of the two:

French Troops in the French and Indian War:

  1. Conventional Warfare:

    • The French troops typically engaged in set-piece battles and formal military tactics, following European styles of warfare. They relied on well-trained, disciplined soldiers in organized formations.
  2. Alliances with Native Americans:

    • The French often allied themselves with various Native American tribes, using their knowledge of the terrain and guerrilla tactics. They leveraged these alliances to conduct surprise attacks and ambushes, capitalizing on local relationships.
  3. Fortified Positions:

    • The French established forts and outposts along key strategic locations in North America, which allowed them to control important waterways and trade routes while also serving as defensive strongholds.
  4. Logistics and Supply Lines:

    • French troops relied on supply lines from their bases in Canada and allowed for the movement of resources to support their military efforts in the colonies.

American Patriots during the Revolutionary War:

  1. Guerrilla Warfare:

    • American patriots often employed unconventional tactics, including hit-and-run attacks, ambushes, and using the element of surprise. They made effective use of local terrain and knowledge, similar to the Native American tactics they learned about during the earlier conflict.
  2. Militia Structure:

    • The patriots relied on local militias composed of volunteers who were less formally trained and equipped than regular armies. These militias could quickly mobilize in response to British movements, allowing for flexible and adaptive strategies.
  3. Use of Propaganda and Psychological Tactics:

    • The patriots utilized propaganda to boost morale, rally support for their cause, and undermine British credibility. This included pamphlets, speeches, and newspapers that reinforced the revolutionary ideology.
  4. Focus on Attrition:

    • Rather than seeking decisive battles, American patriots aimed to wear down British forces over time. They understood that the British could maintain their presence but would eventually exhaust their resources and commitment to fight a protracted war.

Summary:

In summary, while the French military in the French and Indian War relied on conventional European tactics and alliances with Native Americans, the American patriots evolved a more flexible approach during the Revolutionary War, incorporating guerrilla strategies, local militia organization, and a focus on psychological warfare and attrition. This adaptability and understanding of their environment played a crucial role in their eventual success against British forces.