Hi ya!

So I got a question like when I'm rationalzing a denomenator in order to get simple radical form I really don't know what to do

for example this problem

(6^(2^-1)-3^(2^-1))^-1

ok so I know your trying to get it so it's a perfect sqaure right so I can legally write this

(6^(2^-1)-3^(2^-1))^-1 A = (6 - 3)^-1 = 3^-1

or a simplified formula

(6^(2^-1)-3^(2^-1))^-1 A = 3^-1
and solve for A were A equals the value needed to get the perfect square 6-3 or simply 3 right so I solved

A=3^-1(6^(2^-1)-3^(2^-1))

and I get some value which is equal to
(6^(2^-1)+3^(2^-1))^-1
but where s the proof that this is correct using that formula all you get is some number and I have no idea how you get this answer I know you just make the negetive positive but what allows you to do that?????

1 answer

You still haven't read about conjugates. You are NOT trying to get a perfect square, you are trying to get a difference of perfect squares.
http://www.regentsprep.org/Regents/math/algtrig/ATO3/rdlesson.htm
Similar Questions
  1. Energy in Waves Quick Check4 of 54 of 5 Items Question Use the image of the electromagnetic spectrum to answer the question. The
    1. answers icon 0 answers
  2. Question 3A)Order the following main events in early South American history from first to last. Place the earliest event at the
    1. answers icon 2 answers
  3. Put the cones in order from greatest volume to least volume.Try to put them in order thinking about the formula instead of
    1. answers icon 5 answers
    1. answers icon 1 answer
more similar questions