Find one difference between the Arizona state constitution and the US Constitution. Explain why you think this difference occurred.
One difference that I found between my state constitution (AZ) and the U.S. Constitution is the issue of voting. Things that are voted on country wide thus under the direction of the U.S. Constitution happen in a long process, where no one group of people decide the outcome. Instead it seems that one vote happens, then another, then another. In the Arizona State Constitution, in the matter of things like propositions and state judges, things are voted on in a way that is much more direct. Citizens cast their vote and the result of that one vote is acting law.
Can you tell me if this makes sense? And and could you tell me more differences between the constitutions?
1 answer
I think you mean that some state laws are voted on by the people directly instead of enacted by the state legislature, and that judges in the state courts are elected. You would be correct in finding those to be different than the way things happen on the national level where Federal judges are appointed by the President and approved by the Senate. Initiative and referendum are also constricted by the U.S. Constitution on the national level. IF that is what you mean, your language in what you wrote is convoluted. And I have no idea what you mean by an acting law. Is that about actors and actresses performing in TV shows or movies?