In a post-event evaluation meeting for a sports event, such as a marathon, an event manager can utilize the Kirkpatrick Model, which outlines four levels of evaluation: Reaction, Learning, Behavior, and Results. Each level can be adapted to gather comprehensive insights about the event’s success and areas for improvement.
1. Reaction
At this level, the focus is on participant and stakeholder feedback regarding their overall experience of the marathon. The event manager may collect data through surveys or interviews with runners, volunteers, sponsors, and spectators. Key questions might include:
- How satisfied were you with the event organization?
- Was the registration process efficient?
- Were the facilities (bathrooms, medical assistance, etc.) adequate?
- What did you think of the post-race amenities (food, drinks, entertainment)?
An example of findings could be overwhelmingly positive reactions regarding the enthusiasm of volunteers and the quality of post-race refreshments, but some complaints about the crowded registration area.
2. Learning
This level assesses whether participants gained knowledge or skills from the event. For the marathon, the manager may evaluate:
- Did runners learn about pacing strategies through pre-race workshops?
- Were informational packets about training or nutrition beneficial to participants?
- Did volunteers receive adequate training to perform their roles effectively?
Feedback may show that many runners appreciated the pre-marathon workshop on injury prevention, while volunteers felt underprepared for their tasks, highlighting areas for further development in training programs.
3. Behavior
Behavior evaluation looks at any changes in behavior resulting from the event. This can be observed in:
- Changes in runners’ training habits post-marathon (e.g., more regular training or joining running clubs).
- Increased community involvement among volunteers or sponsorship renewals.
- Media coverage leading to sustained interest in the sport or subsequent events.
For instance, surveys may reveal that a significant percentage of runners reported continuing to train for future events, suggesting a sustained commitment to running as a result of their experience at the marathon.
4. Results
The final level evaluates the broader impact of the event in terms of measurable outcomes:
- Financial outcomes, such as profit or loss from the event compared to expectations.
- Attendance numbers compared to previous years or registration targets.
- Community engagement metrics, such as local business sponsorships or volunteer hours contributed.
In this example, the evaluation might reveal that attendance surpassed last year's figures, leading to a 20% increase in revenue. Additionally, feedback could indicate that local businesses reported increased sales during the event weekend due to the influx of participants and spectators.
Conclusion
By systematically evaluating the marathon using these four levels, the event manager can gain a detailed understanding of the event’s strengths and weaknesses. This structured approach not only aids in enhancing future events but also fosters a culture of continuous improvement in planning and execution within the sports community.
1 answer