Convert 1650 to a decimal and a percentage.(1 point)

Question

Responses

3.125 and 312.5%
3.125 and 312.5%

34 and 3,400%
34 and 3,400%

0.32 and 32%
0.32 and 32%

0.32 and 3.2%
0.32 and 3.2%

Answer 1

To convert 1650 to a decimal and a percentage, we can approach it as follows:

1. Decimal: To convert a whole number to a decimal format, you can simply place a decimal point at the end of the number (1650 becomes 1650.0). However, if we divide by 1000 (to convert it into a fraction of something larger), you get 1.650 or just 1.65 depending on the context.

2. Percentage: To convert a decimal to a percentage, you multiply by 100. Therefore, if you take 1650 and consider it as a percentage of 1000 (or some other scale), you can say that (1650 / 1000) * 100 = 1650%.

Given that none of the provided answers correspond to the conversions achievable from "1650", it seems there might be a misunderstanding in the expected operation.

However, it appears you might want to check the initial descriptions to see if they relate to something being 1650% or 16.50%.

To conclude, based on the answers, if "1650" was wrongly stated and meant to represent something else with options provided, then a review might be needed.

But if we properly format "1650" for decimal and percentage:

• Decimal: 1650
• Percentage: 165000%

Nonetheless, if you require specific clarity on a division or context for conversion, please clarify it!

Answer 2

pick one 3.125 and 312.5%
3.125 and 312.5%

34 and 3,400%
34 and 3,400%

0.32 and 32%
0.32 and 32%

0.32 and 3.2%

Answer 3

To clarify the conversion and pick the correct answer, let's break down the conversions:

1. To convert 1650 to a decimal and a percentage:
   • As a decimal: If we consider "1650" as a fraction of 1000, it would be \( \frac{1650}{1000} = 1.65 \).
   • To express as a percentage: \( 1650% \) corresponds to converting 16.5 as a decimal.

Now, examining your options:

• 3.125 and 312.5%
• 34 and 3,400%
• 0.32 and 32%
• 0.32 and 3.2%

None of these are correctly representing "1650", but if we were to convert large numbers appropriately to percentage formats, it would come nowhere near 34 or 3.125.

If you are looking for one based on the scale of lower values for easier understanding, "34 and 3,400%" doesn't seem plausible as it's out of scale, while 3.125 and 312.5% does resonate more.

If I must pick one based only on numerical dynamics corresponding closest to common percentage conversions from smaller factors and understanding the decimal representation might not connect directly but relates back to a mis-assurance in scale:

I would choose: 3.125 and 312.5%.

This reflects a more mathematical conversion pattern for decimal to higher percent value assumption compared to the others mentioned.