What was the impact of the boycott on rail service in surrounding Chicago?
The boycott declared by the American Railway Union (ARU) in support of the Pullman strike had a significant impact on rail service in the surrounding areas, effectively halting rail traffic and commerce across 27 states stretching from Chicago to the West Coast. This widespread disruption underscored the power of collective action among workers and marked a critical moment in American labor history, as it represented the first instance of a sympathy action, where workers not directly involved in a dispute took action to support their fellow laborers.
How did the federal government react to the strike?
The federal government's reaction to the strike was swift and forceful. After the Pullman Company sought help from the General Managers Association (GMA), Attorney General Richard Olney successfully convinced a federal judge to issue an injunction against the strikers. Following the issuance of the injunction, President Grover Cleveland sent 10,000 federal troops to Chicago to suppress the strike. The use of federal troops marked a decisive and aggressive intervention in the dispute, indicating the government's alignment with corporate interests over those of the striking workers.
Describe the violence that occurred on July 7, 1894.
On July 7, 1894, violence erupted as federal troops began to enforce the injunction against the strikers. Rioting broke out in Chicago, leading to confrontations between the troops and the striking workers. The situation escalated, resulting in several strikers being killed during the clashes. The violence marked a tragic and bloody chapter in the Pullman strike, illustrating the intense conflict between labor and authority at the time and contributing to the broader narrative of labor struggles in the United States. Ultimately, by July 10, the strike was broken, and many of the strikers were left unemployed, while union leaders were blacklisted by the Pullman Company.