Asked by loli
is this correct
3x-3=0
3x-3+0=0
3x-3=0
f(x)=3x-3
table:
1 f(1)=3(1)-3 so it will be (1,0)
-1 f(-1)=3(-1)-3 so it will be (-1,-6)
2 f(-2)= 3(-2)-3 so it will be(-2,-9)
what are some videos i can watch that sums up this equation?
3x-3=0
3x-3+0=0
3x-3=0
f(x)=3x-3
table:
1 f(1)=3(1)-3 so it will be (1,0)
-1 f(-1)=3(-1)-3 so it will be (-1,-6)
2 f(-2)= 3(-2)-3 so it will be(-2,-9)
what are some videos i can watch that sums up this equation?
Answers
Answered by
Reiny
in
"is this correct
3x-3=0
3x-3+0=0
3x-3=0 "
you really haven't done anything
were you "solving" 3x-3 = 0 ??
then
3x-3=0
3x=3
x = 1
you then simply state
f(x) = 3x-3
Is that somehow related to the first part other than by appearance ?
2 f(-2) = 3(-2) - 3 so it will be (-2,-9)
is really "bad form" in mathematics and reminds me of a run-on sentence in English grammar
What is the "it" in that expression?
What is the "2" in front of f(x) ?
normally that would mean 2 times f(x) .
sorry to be so critical, but Mathematics is a very precise language.
(your actual calculations are correct, I just don't like the way you state them)
"is this correct
3x-3=0
3x-3+0=0
3x-3=0 "
you really haven't done anything
were you "solving" 3x-3 = 0 ??
then
3x-3=0
3x=3
x = 1
you then simply state
f(x) = 3x-3
Is that somehow related to the first part other than by appearance ?
2 f(-2) = 3(-2) - 3 so it will be (-2,-9)
is really "bad form" in mathematics and reminds me of a run-on sentence in English grammar
What is the "it" in that expression?
What is the "2" in front of f(x) ?
normally that would mean 2 times f(x) .
sorry to be so critical, but Mathematics is a very precise language.
(your actual calculations are correct, I just don't like the way you state them)
There are no AI answers yet. The ability to request AI answers is coming soon!
Submit Your Answer
We prioritize human answers over AI answers.
If you are human, and you can answer this question, please submit your answer.