Ask a New Question

Asked by John

Prove that (xt+yr)/yt is already in lowest terms, b and d have no common prime factor. Note that x/y and r/t are fractions in reduced terms.
12 years ago

Answers

Answered by sean
14 -10 1/6
7 years ago
There are no AI answers yet. The ability to request AI answers is coming soon!

Submit Your Answer


We prioritize human answers over AI answers.

If you are human, and you can answer this question, please submit your answer.

Related Questions

I answered this question already, but would like you to check if the answer I provided was right. If... Can we try this again? I already posted this question and thank you for responding but I just don't... Prove that the sum of the vectors from the vertices to the centre of a regular octogon is a zero... Prove that sin(A+B+C+)cos(B+C)-cos(A+B+C)sin(B+C)=sinA How to prove this (e^(2^-1 i3pi) - e^-(2^-1 i3pi))/(2i) = -1 if you could show me this that wo... Prove 3+4+5+...+(n+2) = [n(n+5)]/2 for n>4 Do the first step in a proof by induction. Prove that 20^22 - 17^22 + 4^33 - 1 is divisible by 174. PLEASE GIVE THE ANSWER,I ALREADY INPUT TO YOUR FORMULA AND IT IS FALSE... Is your answer 0.57?... Can someone edit this? I already edited it but it would still be helpful to get feedback. Altho... Prove: 1) 1 / sec X - tan X = sec X + tan X 2) cot A + tan A = sec A csc A 3)sec A - 1 / se...
Submit Your Answer

Question

Prove that (xt+yr)/yt is already in lowest terms, b and d have no common prime factor. Note that x/y and r/t are fractions in reduced terms.

Ask a New Question
Archives Contact Us Privacy Policy Terms of Use