Asked by Anonymous
                what are the missing reasons in the 2 column proof?
Given: JM = ML and m<JMK > m<KML
Prove: JK > KL
Statements Reasons
1. JM = ML 1. Given
2. KM = KM 2. ?
3. m<JMK > m<KML 3. Given
4. JK > KL 4. ?
I think 2 is reflection but im not positive. and I have no clue about 4.
            
            
        Given: JM = ML and m<JMK > m<KML
Prove: JK > KL
Statements Reasons
1. JM = ML 1. Given
2. KM = KM 2. ?
3. m<JMK > m<KML 3. Given
4. JK > KL 4. ?
I think 2 is reflection but im not positive. and I have no clue about 4.
Answers
Submit Your Answer
We prioritize human answers over AI answers.
If you are human, and you can answer this question, please submit your answer.