Asked by Dynamite
What are the missing reasons in the two-column proof?
Given: modifying above with right arrow upper M upper O bisects angle upper P upper M upper N and modifying above with right arrow upper O upper M bisects angle upper P upper O upper N
Prove: triangle upper P upper M upper O congruent to triangle upper N upper M upper O
A two column proof and a diagram are shown.
Given: modifying above with right arrow upper M upper O bisects angle upper P upper M upper N and modifying above with right arrow upper O upper M bisects angle upper P upper O upper N
Prove: triangle upper P upper M upper O congruent to triangle upper N upper M upper O
A two column proof and a diagram are shown.
Answers
Answered by
oobleck
no columns. Why don't you make the table, and forget all that arrow stuff, and just name the segments or rays, as in MO bisects <PMN.
Give reasons where you have them, and take a stab at the missing ones.
Give reasons where you have them, and take a stab at the missing ones.
There are no AI answers yet. The ability to request AI answers is coming soon!
Submit Your Answer
We prioritize human answers over AI answers.
If you are human, and you can answer this question, please submit your answer.