Asked by Cristian
In the derivation of this expression:
[ln]/[HIn]A# 2 * A#1,acid/A# 2,basic * A#1
We assumed that the HIn form of the indicator is the only form present in the most acidic solution. Is this a valid assumption? Why or why not? Support your answer by determining the amount of In--‐ present in the most acidic solution. You may assume that the initial concentration of the indicator is 1mM.
I think that the assumption of the Hln form of the indicator is the only form present in the most acidic solution is valid but I am not sure how I would go about supporting my answer by determining the amount of ln- present in the most acidic solution.
[ln]/[HIn]A# 2 * A#1,acid/A# 2,basic * A#1
We assumed that the HIn form of the indicator is the only form present in the most acidic solution. Is this a valid assumption? Why or why not? Support your answer by determining the amount of In--‐ present in the most acidic solution. You may assume that the initial concentration of the indicator is 1mM.
I think that the assumption of the Hln form of the indicator is the only form present in the most acidic solution is valid but I am not sure how I would go about supporting my answer by determining the amount of ln- present in the most acidic solution.
Answers
Answered by
Dr. Friedman
This is a funny one.
There are no AI answers yet. The ability to request AI answers is coming soon!
Submit Your Answer
We prioritize human answers over AI answers.
If you are human, and you can answer this question, please submit your answer.