Duplicate Question
The question on this page has been marked as a duplicate question.
Original Question
What is the wavelength of the transition from n=4 to n=3 for Li2+? In what region of the spectrum does this emission occur? Li2...Asked by Lauren
What is the wavelength of the transition from n=4 to n=3 for Li2+? In what region of the spectrum does this emission occur? Li2+ is a hydrogen-like ion. Such an ion has a nucleus of charge +Ze and a single electron outside this nucleus. The energy levels of the ion are -Z^2RH/n^, where Z is the atomic number
okay I saw the rydberg formula but how am i or what numbers am i supposed to plug where
okay I saw the rydberg formula but how am i or what numbers am i supposed to plug where
Answers
Answered by
drwls
The energy levels are
En = -Z^2RH/n^2
You left out the 2.
In your case, calculate En for Z = 3, with n = 4 and again for Z = 3 and n=3. Call those energy numbers E4 and E3.
E4 - E3 is the wave number (1/wavelength) of the photon emitted.
Invert that to get the wavelength
En = -Z^2RH/n^2
You left out the 2.
In your case, calculate En for Z = 3, with n = 4 and again for Z = 3 and n=3. Call those energy numbers E4 and E3.
E4 - E3 is the wave number (1/wavelength) of the photon emitted.
Invert that to get the wavelength
Answered by
DrBob222
DrWLS showed you what to do.
1/lambda = R<sub>H</sub>Z<sup>2</sup>*[(1/N<sub>1</sub><sup>2</sup>)-(1/N<sub>2</sub><sup>2</sup>].
R<sub>H</sub> = 1.0967758341 x 10^7
Z = 3
N<sub>1</sub> = 3
N<sub>2</sub> = 4
Solve for lambda.
1/lambda = R<sub>H</sub>Z<sup>2</sup>*[(1/N<sub>1</sub><sup>2</sup>)-(1/N<sub>2</sub><sup>2</sup>].
R<sub>H</sub> = 1.0967758341 x 10^7
Z = 3
N<sub>1</sub> = 3
N<sub>2</sub> = 4
Solve for lambda.
Answered by
Lauren
okay so it should look like this
1/lambda= 1.0967758341 x 10^7(3^2)*[(1/3^2)-(1/4^2)]
1.0967758341 x 10^7(9)(.0486)
i got 4798394.274
1/lambda= 1.0967758341 x 10^7(3^2)*[(1/3^2)-(1/4^2)]
1.0967758341 x 10^7(9)(.0486)
i got 4798394.274
Answered by
DrBob222
I don't get that. Your work LOOKS ok to me except your answer is 1/lambda. You need to take the reciprocal, right?
Answered by
Lauren
so i got 1/4797297.498
Answered by
DrBob222
Plug that into your calculator; i.e., divide 1 by that large number and the answer will be the wavelength. That's what you are trying to find.
Answered by
DrBob222
One note.
Since you are carrying all the other numbers to such high precision, I would suggest you carry the 0.0486 you obtained to the same number of significant figures.
Since you are carrying all the other numbers to such high precision, I would suggest you carry the 0.0486 you obtained to the same number of significant figures.
Answered by
Lauren
so I did 1 divided by 4797297.498
and got 2.085 X 10^-7
and got 2.085 X 10^-7
Answered by
DrBob222
That's what I have. Usually the answer is expressed either in Angstrom units or in nanometers. Your answer is 208.5 nm or 2085 Angstroms. Again, if you want to carry that many places for R<sub>H</sub>, then you are justified in more placed in the answer. I don't know how your professor wants it done. Many use 1.097 x 10^7 for R<sub>H</sub>.
There are no AI answers yet. The ability to request AI answers is coming soon!
Submit Your Answer
We prioritize human answers over AI answers.
If you are human, and you can answer this question, please submit your answer.