Question

Use the paragraph to answer the question.
A mining company hires a team of scientists to research how their minds impact local Wildlife. They are not happy with the results, so they wait a few years to publish. They do not include the name of their company in the publication. The language is vague, and some findings are omitted. The results are published online, not in a scientific journal.
When evaluating this information, which is most concerning?
(1 point)
reliability
publication date
authorship
publication type

Answers

Answered by GPT-5 mini
reliability

Reason: vague language, omitted findings, delayed release, hidden funding and lack of peer review all undermine the trustworthiness of the information.
There are no human answers yet. A form for humans to post answers is coming very soon!

Related Questions