How does the authors' use of language in paragraph 2 of the article "Cameras in the Courtroom" and paragraph 1 of the article "Challenging the Status Quo" convey DIFFERENT tones?

*
The phrase "supported the ban" in "Cameras in the Courtroom" expresses a pleased tone, while the phrase "stuck in old ways" in "Challenging the Status Quo" contributes to a frustrated tone.
The phrase "defendants would get nervous" in "Cameras in the Courtoom" expresses a concerned tone, while the phrase "a closed loop" in "Challenging the Status Quo" indicates an explanatory tone.
The phrase "jurors would be distracted" in "Cameras in the Courtroom" contributes to a scornful tone, while the phrase "Everyone should be" in "Challenging the Status Quo" suggests an arrogant tone.
The phrase "All these factors" in "Cameras in the Courtroom" develops an analytical tone, while the phrase "better way of functioning" in "Challengin the Status Quo" builds a hopeful tone.

1 answer

The first option is the most appropriate: "The phrase 'supported the ban' in 'Cameras in the Courtroom' expresses a pleased tone, while the phrase 'stuck in old ways' in 'Challenging the Status Quo' contributes to a frustrated tone."

In "Cameras in the Courtroom," the use of "supported the ban" suggests a positive affirmation of maintaining certain standards, which can create a sense of satisfaction or approval among those who favor the ban. In contrast, the phrase "stuck in old ways" in "Challenging the Status Quo" conveys frustration and a sense of stagnation, implying that the current state of affairs is outdated and needs to be challenged or changed.

This contrast in wording and implication clearly demonstrates how the authors' language choices contribute to differing tones in each paragraph.