Question

7. How do the authors of “Reaching Great Heights” and “A Monumental Feat” present their topics differently? (1 point) Responses The author of “A Monumental Feat” gives a historical perspective, while the author of “Reaching Great Heights” does not. The author of “A Monumental Feat” gives a historical perspective, while the author of “Reaching Great Heights” does not. The author of “A Monumental Feat” has visited the Eiffel Tower, while the author of “Reaching Great Heights” has not visited the Empire State Building. The author of “A Monumental Feat” has visited the Eiffel Tower, while the author of “Reaching Great Heights” has not visited the Empire State Building. The author of “A Monumental Feat” is clearly awed by the Eiffel Tower, while the author of “Reaching Great Heights” is not very interested in the Empire State Building. The author of “A Monumental Feat” is clearly awed by the Eiffel Tower, while the author of “Reaching Great Heights” is not very interested in the Empire State Building. The author of “A Monumental Feat” describes positive and negative public opinions, while the author of “Reaching Great Heights” focuses on the positive.

Answer 1

The most accurate response would be: "The author of 'A Monumental Feat' gives a historical perspective, while the author of 'Reaching Great Heights' does not." This highlights a key difference in how each author approaches their subject matter, focusing on historical context versus a more contemporary or personal viewpoint.