On saturday. I went to the Bates County Museum of Art with my parents. We saw the new modem art exhibrt, and it was pretty strange. There were one painting that didnt realy look like anything but slattered paint. Another painting was made out of toil and torn paper. There were aiso lots of crazy statues metal, bottles, and cans. One even made out of bicycle parts. Did I mention that we ate lunch first? Anyway, the exhibit might be interesting for somebody who like moder art.

Three-Point General Rubric
Criteria
The writing is clearly focused on the task
A main idea is well-developed and supported with relevant details, There are almost no errors in grammar, spelling, and punctuation.
The writing is related to the task but generally lacks focus
Support for the main idea is not clear or is missing.
There are a few errors in grammar, spelling, and punctuation.
The writing is not focused on the task
There is no clear main idea.
There are many errors in grammar, spelling and punctuation.
How does this passage meet the third criterion in the rubric?
It has many punctuation, spelling, and grammar errors.
It has 3-5 punctuation, spelling, and grammar errors
it has 1-2 punctuation, spelling, and grammar errors.
unas no punctuaton, spellino, or crammar errors.

1 answer

The passage meets the third criterion in the rubric because it has many punctuation, spelling, and grammar errors. Here are some examples of the errors present in the passage:

  1. "modem" should be "modern."
  2. "exhibrt" should be "exhibit."
  3. "slattered" should be "splattered."
  4. "toil" should likely be "foil" (if referring to a type of paper).
  5. "aiso" should be "also."
  6. "made out of bicycle parts" is missing "was" for parallel structure in the sentence.

Given that these and potentially more errors exist, it aligns well with the option stating it has "many errors in grammar, spelling, and punctuation."