Here are the answers to your questions based on the provided options:
Question 1:
A) What is the main purpose of collaborating with other members of a collegial discussion group?
Response: Collaboration helps the group build consensus on a topic.
Question 2:
A) What is a way to move a conversation forward after a disagreement?
Response: Ask questions to get more information.
Question 3:
A) What does Miguel do in paragraph 7?
Response: He adds a justification to his argument in favor of mandatory volunteer work.
Question 4:
A) Compared to the video, what effect does the visual media of the passage have on the tone of the article?
Response: It contributes to a critical tone by showing the results of a deadly fire.
Question 5:
A) Which two paragraphs in the passage, when combined, have a claim/counterclaim structure?
Response: paragraphs 5 and 6
Question 6:
A) Which of the following details from the first text is clarified further in the second text?
Response: Dr. Semmelweis was brilliant but had two strikes against him when applying for a position at the Vienna General Hospital in 1846: he was Hungarian and Jewish.
Question 7:
A) Which choice best analyzes how the rhetorical questions in the second paragraph of the excerpt advance the speaker’s point of view or purpose?
Response: They develop the argument that there are few legitimate justifications for not voting.
Question 8:
A) Why might the author have used the word conflagration here?
Response: to show the intensity and size of the fire.
Question 9:
A) Which of the following would be a way the author could strengthen the last paragraph to make his claim more valid?
Response: adding evidence for how spending time in nature improves mental health.
Question 10:
A) Which type of logical fallacy does this argument contain?
Response: straw man.
Feel free to ask if you need any further assistance or clarification!