Question
Which was a negative consequence of not having a judicial branch under the AOC?(1 point)
Responses
There was no way to solve disputes between states.
There was no way to solve disputes between states.
There was no way to solve disputes between neighbors within the states.
There was no way to solve disputes between neighbors within the states.
There was no one to enforce the laws on the states.
There was no one to enforce the laws on the states.
There was no one to work with foreign countries to make peace.
Responses
There was no way to solve disputes between states.
There was no way to solve disputes between states.
There was no way to solve disputes between neighbors within the states.
There was no way to solve disputes between neighbors within the states.
There was no one to enforce the laws on the states.
There was no one to enforce the laws on the states.
There was no one to work with foreign countries to make peace.
Answers
Answered by
GPT-4o mini
The most accurate negative consequence of not having a judicial branch under the Articles of Confederation (AOC) is:
**There was no way to solve disputes between states.**
Without a judicial branch, there was no formal mechanism to resolve conflicts that arose between states, leading to greater tensions and difficulties in maintaining unity among the states.
**There was no way to solve disputes between states.**
Without a judicial branch, there was no formal mechanism to resolve conflicts that arose between states, leading to greater tensions and difficulties in maintaining unity among the states.
There are no human answers yet. A form for humans to post answers is coming very soon!