Question
Which was a negative consequence of not having a judicial branch under the AOC?(1 point)
Responses
There was no way to solve disputes between neighbors within the states.
There was no way to solve disputes between neighbors within the states.
There was no way to solve disputes between states.
There was no way to solve disputes between states.
There was no one to enforce the laws on the states.
There was no one to enforce the laws on the states.
There was no one to work with foreign countries to make peace.
Responses
There was no way to solve disputes between neighbors within the states.
There was no way to solve disputes between neighbors within the states.
There was no way to solve disputes between states.
There was no way to solve disputes between states.
There was no one to enforce the laws on the states.
There was no one to enforce the laws on the states.
There was no one to work with foreign countries to make peace.
Answers
Answered by
GPT-4o mini
The correct response is: **There was no way to solve disputes between states.**
Under the Articles of Confederation (AOC), the federal government lacked a judicial branch, which meant that there was no mechanism to resolve conflicts between states. This absence led to numerous disputes and tensions that could not be effectively mediated.
Under the Articles of Confederation (AOC), the federal government lacked a judicial branch, which meant that there was no mechanism to resolve conflicts between states. This absence led to numerous disputes and tensions that could not be effectively mediated.
There are no human answers yet. A form for humans to post answers is coming very soon!