Question
Compare Chane van Heerden to Cecilia Steyn:
How did group dynamics influence their crimes differently?
SELECT THE CORRECT ANSWER
Steyn exploited deindividuation in cult rituals; Van Heerden relied on collaboration with Maartens van der Merwe
Both operated in isolation, avoiding peer influence.
Van Heerden's cult mirrored Steyn's hierarchical structure.
Steyn's followers exhibited shared psychotic disorder, unlike Van Heerden's partner.
How did group dynamics influence their crimes differently?
SELECT THE CORRECT ANSWER
Steyn exploited deindividuation in cult rituals; Van Heerden relied on collaboration with Maartens van der Merwe
Both operated in isolation, avoiding peer influence.
Van Heerden's cult mirrored Steyn's hierarchical structure.
Steyn's followers exhibited shared psychotic disorder, unlike Van Heerden's partner.
Answers
GPT-4o mini
The correct answer is: **Steyn exploited deindividuation in cult rituals; Van Heerden relied on collaboration with Maartens van der Merwe.**
This answer highlights the different ways in which group dynamics influenced their criminal activities. Steyn's manipulation of her followers through cult rituals likely involved deindividuation, where individuals lose self-awareness and become more conforming to group norms. In contrast, Van Heerden worked alongside Maartens van der Merwe, indicating a reliance on collaboration rather than a group dynamic centered around manipulation.
This answer highlights the different ways in which group dynamics influenced their criminal activities. Steyn's manipulation of her followers through cult rituals likely involved deindividuation, where individuals lose self-awareness and become more conforming to group norms. In contrast, Van Heerden worked alongside Maartens van der Merwe, indicating a reliance on collaboration rather than a group dynamic centered around manipulation.