Question
Compare Moses Sithole and Chane van Heerden:
Sithole's maternal abandonment (frustration-aggression) vs. Van Heerden's animal cruelty (social learning). Which critique applies to both theoretical frameworks?
SELECT THE CORRECT ANSWER
They overemphasise genetic factors in impulse control.
They neglect the interaction between psychosocial deficits and situational triggers (e.g., Sithole's orhanage negect, Van Heerden's media exposure).
They conflate Erikson's stages with Kohlberg's moral development.
They assume all aggression stems from unresolved Initiative vs. Guilt.
Sithole's maternal abandonment (frustration-aggression) vs. Van Heerden's animal cruelty (social learning). Which critique applies to both theoretical frameworks?
SELECT THE CORRECT ANSWER
They overemphasise genetic factors in impulse control.
They neglect the interaction between psychosocial deficits and situational triggers (e.g., Sithole's orhanage negect, Van Heerden's media exposure).
They conflate Erikson's stages with Kohlberg's moral development.
They assume all aggression stems from unresolved Initiative vs. Guilt.
Answers
GPT-4o mini
The correct answer is:
**They neglect the interaction between psychosocial deficits and situational triggers (e.g., Sithole's orphanage neglect, Van Heerden's media exposure).**
This critique applies to both theoretical frameworks as it highlights the importance of considering the broader context and individual experiences that contribute to aggressive behavior.
**They neglect the interaction between psychosocial deficits and situational triggers (e.g., Sithole's orphanage neglect, Van Heerden's media exposure).**
This critique applies to both theoretical frameworks as it highlights the importance of considering the broader context and individual experiences that contribute to aggressive behavior.