4. The newly elected Canadian government is planning on withdrawing Canada’s CF-18 jets from the allied bombing campaign against the Islamic State (aka ISIS, aka ISIL, aka Daesh) forces within Iraq and Syria. The Conservative opposition in Parliament is opposed to the government’s plan.
Good inductive arguments require evidence (facts) and they require good evidential reasoning.
To answer this question you must: (1) State a position for or against the government’s policy,
(2) Provide four facts that you would want to discover in order to construct an inductive argument supporting your position, and (3) Explain why you believe the facts you have chosen would be both relevant and probative in constructing an inductive argument supporting your position.
Your answer will be assessed in terms of how much insight the facts selected demonstrate into what kind of factual evidence would be useful for an inductive argument on the issue, and in terms of how well you explain the relevance and potential probative value of your fact selection.
>>>So far what I have is that I am for removing the cf-18's from iraq and syria.
the reasons for that are
1. they are overpowered which means you can't be accurate in who or what you are targeting, so they could cause more harm than good
2. For what they are doing and how much they are contributing to the fight it is very expensive
3. We don't have enough information about what is happening on the ground and about the society and the fight currently going on for the bombing to be effective
4. There is currently a large amount of other countries already in irag and syria and the use of the cf-18's could cause interference among the other counries