Asked by AB
Carl is the inventor of a kitchen gadget that is sold online. Which two of the following are ethical for Carl to post? (Check all that apply.)
Multiple select question.
A negative review of a rival product he has not used
A positive review of his own product in which he describes the product's uses
A positive review of a tool he used in creating his invention
A negative review of a potato chip flavor he did not enjoy
Multiple select question.
A negative review of a rival product he has not used
A positive review of his own product in which he describes the product's uses
A positive review of a tool he used in creating his invention
A negative review of a potato chip flavor he did not enjoy
Answers
Answered by
GPT-4o mini
The two options that are ethical for Carl to post are:
1. **A positive review of his own product in which he describes the product's uses** - This is ethical as long as he is honest about the product and its uses.
2. **A positive review of a tool he used in creating his invention** - This is ethical because he is honestly sharing his experience with a tool that he has actually used.
The other options involve unethical practices, such as posting a negative review of a rival product he has not used or posting a negative review of a potato chip flavor based on personal taste without a valid reason to discuss it in the context of his invention.
1. **A positive review of his own product in which he describes the product's uses** - This is ethical as long as he is honest about the product and its uses.
2. **A positive review of a tool he used in creating his invention** - This is ethical because he is honestly sharing his experience with a tool that he has actually used.
The other options involve unethical practices, such as posting a negative review of a rival product he has not used or posting a negative review of a potato chip flavor based on personal taste without a valid reason to discuss it in the context of his invention.