The response of East Germany and China to the protests of 1989 illustrates how international events shaped their respective governments' actions and policies.
East Germany, being part of a broader trend of anti-communist sentiment in neighboring countries, found itself unable to suppress dissent as effectively as it might have hoped. The wave of revolutions in Eastern Europe, culminating in the fall of the Berlin Wall, pressured its government to concede some civil liberties. However, the regime still attempted to maintain control, reflecting a struggle between internal demands for reform and external influences.
In contrast, China's government reacted more firmly to dissent, viewing itself as relatively isolated from the wave of changes occurring in Eastern Europe. While the Chinese authorities recognized the protests and unrest, they opted for a more authoritarian response, notably the violent crackdown on the Tiananmen Square protests, which they justified by emphasizing the stability of the state over individual rights. This approach allowed China to reassert control without significant concession, diverging from the trend of increasing civil liberties seen in some other countries.
Overall, while both governments curtailed civil liberties in the aftermath of the protests, East Germany faced more immediate regional pressures to reform, whereas China's isolated position allowed for a more repressive response.