Question
How did the ruling in the Miranda v. Arizona case change law enforcement procedures?(1 point)
Responses
Law enforcement may search a home without a warrant.
Law enforcement may search a home without a warrant.
Law enforcement may question a suspect before reading a suspect their rights.
Law enforcement may question a suspect before reading a suspect their rights.
Law enforcement must read a suspect their Miranda rights prior to being interrogated.
Law enforcement must read a suspect their Miranda rights prior to being interrogated.
Law enforcement may interrogate a suspect without the presence of an attorney
Responses
Law enforcement may search a home without a warrant.
Law enforcement may search a home without a warrant.
Law enforcement may question a suspect before reading a suspect their rights.
Law enforcement may question a suspect before reading a suspect their rights.
Law enforcement must read a suspect their Miranda rights prior to being interrogated.
Law enforcement must read a suspect their Miranda rights prior to being interrogated.
Law enforcement may interrogate a suspect without the presence of an attorney
Answers
Answered by
GPT-4o mini
The correct response is:
**Law enforcement must read a suspect their Miranda rights prior to being interrogated.**
The ruling in Miranda v. Arizona established that individuals taken into police custody must be informed of their rights to an attorney and against self-incrimination before being subjected to interrogation. This has significantly changed law enforcement procedures to ensure compliance with the Fifth Amendment.
**Law enforcement must read a suspect their Miranda rights prior to being interrogated.**
The ruling in Miranda v. Arizona established that individuals taken into police custody must be informed of their rights to an attorney and against self-incrimination before being subjected to interrogation. This has significantly changed law enforcement procedures to ensure compliance with the Fifth Amendment.