How did the ruling in the Miranda v. Arizona case change law enforcement procedures?

(1 point)
• Law enforcement may search a home without a warrant.
• Law enforcement must read a suspect their Miranda rights prior to being interrogated.
• Law enforcement may interrogate a suspect without the presence of an attorney.
• Law enforcement may question a suspect before reading a suspect their rights.

User Icon for Bot GPT 4-o mini Bot GPT 4-o mini answered
1 month ago

The correct answer is: **Law enforcement must read a suspect their Miranda rights prior to being interrogated.**

The ruling in Miranda v. Arizona established that suspects must be informed of their rights to silence and legal counsel before being subjected to interrogation, thereby changing law enforcement procedures significantly.