The people’s notion to slaughter the goats is based on a religious or traditional belief. This idea may arise from the stress the population has been facing or has experienced during the time of the natural disaster or may have originated from someone attempting to take advantage of the situation. It is a non-scientific belief, as scientific theories are based on a body of facts that have been repeatedly tested and confirmed through experiments and observations. As such, this theory or superstitious notion cannot be substantiated. It is an open idea that can be examined, but the desired outcome will not materialize.

Question

President Yudhoyono’s response to the SMS appeal regarding the sacrifice of goats was a fitting reply. Natural disasters occur independently and cannot be halted simply because some goats are slaughtered. By dismissing the fanciful notion of goat sacrifices, he appeals to the populace’s common sense and rational discourse. He underscores the necessity to be realistic about the causes of natural disasters and encourages citizens to find comfort in prayer rather than in rituals devoid of scientific foundation. Furthermore, he states that such actions can incite even more panic among the general public and orders an investigation into the origin of the SMS appeal. President Yudhoyono reassures his constituents that any potential alerts regarding natural disasters will always be publicly broadcast through national television or radio, ensuring that the public will consistently be well-informed.

In Indonesia, where superstition frequently intertwines with religion, such beliefs can gain traction, particularly during challenging times. In such instances, having a rational leader who can think critically and lead with a clear mind can make the crucial difference between life and death. A notable example would be during the earthquake in September 2018 that struck the island of Sulawesi, which triggered a tsunami that killed bolt of people and destroyed infrastructures. President Joko Widodo’s response was to remain calm and that his government was working on immediate reliefs for the earthquake’s victim. He was also on the ground at where the disaster took place to show his citizens thay were affected support and to reassure them that their needs will be met.

The superstitious idea to sacrifice the goats is rooted in a religious or traditional belief that natural disasters are caused by divine forces. This theory cannot be tested, as natural disasters are caused by natural phenomena and not by divine intervention. This superstitious theory can be examined, but the results will never be consistent, as it lacks a scientific foundation. Therefore, it is safe to assert that regardless of whether the president slaughters a thousand goats each time a natural disaster occurs, the outcome will always be a matter of chance. Natural disasters transpire at their own will and may cease abruptly, regardless of whether a thousand goats have been sacrificed.
To conclude, this idea is not scientifically based and as such cannot be scientifically tested. It is only a religious idea or belief and will always be only that.

Does my essay follow a logical order and does it make sense and if it doesn't can u suggest ideas on how to make it better

Answer 1

Your essay presents a clear argument against the superstition of sacrificing goats in response to natural disasters, emphasizing the distinction between religious beliefs and scientific understanding. However, there are areas where you could enhance clarity, coherence, and overall structure. Here are some suggestions to improve your essay:

Structure and Clarity

1. Introduction:

   • Begin with a strong thesis statement that outlines the main argument of your essay. This can be a concise sentence summarizing your stance against the superstitious belief in goat sacrifices.

2. Logical Order:

   • Organize your ideas more clearly. You can use a structure like:
     • Definition of the Belief: Explain the superstition and its origins briefly.
     • Scientific Perspective: Discuss how natural disasters are scientifically understood.
     • Government Response: Detail President Yudhoyono’s and President Joko Widodo’s reactions and why their rational responses are important.
     • Cultural Context: Address how superstition can thrive in difficult times and the need for rational leadership.
     • Conclusion: Reiterate your main argument and the importance of rational discourse in the face of superstition.

3. Transitions:

   • Use clear transition sentences between paragraphs to guide the reader through your argument. This will help in maintaining flow and coherence.

Content Refinement

1. More Specific Examples:

   • Provide concrete examples of the consequences of superstitious beliefs during natural disasters. For example, you could mention specific instances where people were misled by such beliefs, leading to detrimental outcomes.

2. Clarity in Language:

   • Simplify complex sentences for better understanding. Some sentences are lengthy and might make it challenging for the reader to keep track of your arguments.

3. Address Counterarguments:

   • Consider briefly acknowledging the emotional aspect of beliefs during disasters. This helps in presenting a well-rounded argument. You could state why such beliefs might provide comfort to some individuals despite lacking a scientific basis.

4. Conclusion Improvement:

   • Strengthen your conclusion by summarizing the main points and reiterating the importance of rational thought in crisis situations. You might also suggest possible ways to educate communities about scientific explanations for natural disasters.

Example of Revised Structure

Introduction:

• Introduce the issue of goat sacrifices in response to natural disasters, stating your thesis that such beliefs are rooted in superstition and lack scientific support.

Body:

1. Belief in Goat Sacrifice:

   • Discuss the cultural and religious contexts of this belief.

2. Scientific Explanation:

   • Explain how natural disasters occur due to geological and meteorological factors, emphasizing the absence of divine intervention.

3. Government’s Rational Response:

   • Describe President Yudhoyono's and Joko Widodo's rational responses and their importance in guiding public behavior during crises.

4. Impact of Superstition During Crises:

   • Explore how superstition may flourish during difficult times, and the need for rational leadership to combat panic.

Conclusion:

• Reassert that superstition is not scientifically founded, emphasize the necessity for guiding the population through education and rational thought, and end with a call for ongoing discussions about the intersection of belief and reason in disaster response.

By implementing these suggestions, your essay can become more structured and persuasive, effectively communicating your argument against the notion of goat sacrifices during natural disasters.

Answer 2

Use ur suggestions and write a improved essay