To determine if Roxanne's solution of (−3, −3) is correct, we need to find the intersection point of the equations \(y = 23x - 5\) and \(y = -2x + 3\).
-
Set the equations equal to each other since they both equal \(y\): \[ 23x - 5 = -2x + 3 \]
-
Combine the terms: \[ 23x + 2x = 3 + 5 \] \[ 25x = 8 \]
-
Solve for \(x\): \[ x = \frac{8}{25} \]
-
Substitute \(x = \frac{8}{25}\) back into either equation to find \(y\). Let's use \(y = -2x + 3\): \[ y = -2 \left(\frac{8}{25}\right) + 3 = -\frac{16}{25} + 3 = -\frac{16}{25} + \frac{75}{25} = \frac{59}{25} \]
Thus, the intersection point is \(\left(\frac{8}{25}, \frac{59}{25}\right)\), which is not \((-3, -3)\).
Therefore, Roxanne is not correct and the correct explanation is:
No, she switched the x and y values of the intersection point when writing the solution.