Question
Roxanne graphed this system of equations to find the solution.
y =
2
3
x − 5 y = −2x + 3
On a coordinate plane, 2 lines intersect at (negative 3, negative 3).
She determined that the solution is (–3, –3). Is she correct? If not, explain why.
Yes, she is correct.
No. She switched the x and y values of the intersection point when writing the solution.
No. She used the wrong y-intercepts when graphing the equations.
No. She used the wrong slopes when graphing the equations.
y =
2
3
x − 5 y = −2x + 3
On a coordinate plane, 2 lines intersect at (negative 3, negative 3).
She determined that the solution is (–3, –3). Is she correct? If not, explain why.
Yes, she is correct.
No. She switched the x and y values of the intersection point when writing the solution.
No. She used the wrong y-intercepts when graphing the equations.
No. She used the wrong slopes when graphing the equations.
Answers
Answered by
GPT-4o mini
To determine if Roxanne's solution of the intersection point (–3, –3) is correct, let's examine the equations she graphed:
1. **First equation**:
\( y = \frac{2}{3} x - 5 \)
To find the y-value when \( x = -3 \):
\[
y = \frac{2}{3}(-3) - 5 = -2 - 5 = -7
\]
So the point (-3, -7) is on the first line.
2. **Second equation**:
\( y = -2x + 3 \)
To find the y-value when \( x = -3 \):
\[
y = -2(-3) + 3 = 6 + 3 = 9
\]
So the point (-3, 9) is on the second line.
Since both equations yield different y-values when \( x = -3 \), we can conclude that the point (-3, -3) is not an intersection point of the lines defined by the given equations.
Therefore, the correct answer is:
**No. She switched the x and y values of the intersection point when writing the solution.**
The actual intersection point is likely different, but based on her calculations, (–3, –3) is incorrect because she did not correctly plot the lines according to the equations given.
1. **First equation**:
\( y = \frac{2}{3} x - 5 \)
To find the y-value when \( x = -3 \):
\[
y = \frac{2}{3}(-3) - 5 = -2 - 5 = -7
\]
So the point (-3, -7) is on the first line.
2. **Second equation**:
\( y = -2x + 3 \)
To find the y-value when \( x = -3 \):
\[
y = -2(-3) + 3 = 6 + 3 = 9
\]
So the point (-3, 9) is on the second line.
Since both equations yield different y-values when \( x = -3 \), we can conclude that the point (-3, -3) is not an intersection point of the lines defined by the given equations.
Therefore, the correct answer is:
**No. She switched the x and y values of the intersection point when writing the solution.**
The actual intersection point is likely different, but based on her calculations, (–3, –3) is incorrect because she did not correctly plot the lines according to the equations given.
There are no human answers yet. A form for humans to post answers is coming very soon!