Question
Claim 1: Scientific studies have shown that Use the passage to answer the question. genetic engineering poses a grave risk to a plant's 1 genetic integrity. When this integrity is disturbed, Compare the two claims above. How does it the outcome is unpredictable. Dormant toxin levels the first claim establish a formal style when can be activated in the plant, resulting in permanent damage to entire crops. This phenomenon occurred in StarLink corn, a product engineered to resist pests and that triggered life-threatening reactions in humans who consumed it.
Claim 2: Childhood blindness is a huge problem in developing countries. Nutritional deficiencies are usually to blame. That’s bad—horrible, in fact—but it can be avoided. Researchers have developed a variety of rice known as Golden Rice, which produces high levels of beta carotene. Beta carotene's a godsend when it comes to this terrible problem, a thing of the past.
Compare the two claims above, how does the first claim establish a formal style when compared to the second claim?
By using complex vocabulary
By including complex syntax
By using a third-person perspective
By including real world examples
Claim 2: Childhood blindness is a huge problem in developing countries. Nutritional deficiencies are usually to blame. That’s bad—horrible, in fact—but it can be avoided. Researchers have developed a variety of rice known as Golden Rice, which produces high levels of beta carotene. Beta carotene's a godsend when it comes to this terrible problem, a thing of the past.
Compare the two claims above, how does the first claim establish a formal style when compared to the second claim?
By using complex vocabulary
By including complex syntax
By using a third-person perspective
By including real world examples
Answers
GPT-4o mini
The first claim establishes a formal style when compared to the second claim mainly **by including complex syntax** and **by using a third-person perspective**.
1. **Complex Syntax**: The first claim employs longer, more intricate sentence structures that convey the implications of genetic engineering in a detailed manner. For example, it explains the risk of genetic integrity disturbance and its unpredictable outcomes, which requires careful phrasing that contributes to a more formal tone.
2. **Third-Person Perspective**: The first claim speaks from a more objective standpoint, focusing on scientific studies and their implications rather than personal or emotional responses. This enhances the formal style by maintaining a level of detachment and emphasizing the seriousness of the issues being discussed.
In contrast, the second claim uses simpler language and a more direct, conversational style, which makes it less formal. It focuses on an issue that evokes empathy and suggests a simpler resolution, which diminishes its formal tone.
While both claims utilize real-world examples, the impact of those examples aligns differently with formality; the first provides a cautionary tale of genetic engineering, whereas the second presents a hopeful developmental achievement in addressing a significant social problem.
1. **Complex Syntax**: The first claim employs longer, more intricate sentence structures that convey the implications of genetic engineering in a detailed manner. For example, it explains the risk of genetic integrity disturbance and its unpredictable outcomes, which requires careful phrasing that contributes to a more formal tone.
2. **Third-Person Perspective**: The first claim speaks from a more objective standpoint, focusing on scientific studies and their implications rather than personal or emotional responses. This enhances the formal style by maintaining a level of detachment and emphasizing the seriousness of the issues being discussed.
In contrast, the second claim uses simpler language and a more direct, conversational style, which makes it less formal. It focuses on an issue that evokes empathy and suggests a simpler resolution, which diminishes its formal tone.
While both claims utilize real-world examples, the impact of those examples aligns differently with formality; the first provides a cautionary tale of genetic engineering, whereas the second presents a hopeful developmental achievement in addressing a significant social problem.