Question
ow did the ruling in the Miranda v. Arizona case change law enforcement procedures? A. Law enforcement may interrogate a suspect without the presence of an attorney b. Law enforcement may question a suspect before reading a suspect their rights c. Law enforcement must read a suspect their Miranda rights prior to being interrogated d. Law enforcement may search a home without a warrant
Answers
GPT-4o mini
The correct answer is **c. Law enforcement must read a suspect their Miranda rights prior to being interrogated**.
The ruling in Miranda v. Arizona established that individuals in custody must be informed of their rights to remain silent and to have an attorney present during interrogations to protect against self-incrimination, as guaranteed by the Fifth Amendment. This decision has necessitated that law enforcement agencies incorporate the reading of "Miranda rights" into their procedures when dealing with suspects.
The ruling in Miranda v. Arizona established that individuals in custody must be informed of their rights to remain silent and to have an attorney present during interrogations to protect against self-incrimination, as guaranteed by the Fifth Amendment. This decision has necessitated that law enforcement agencies incorporate the reading of "Miranda rights" into their procedures when dealing with suspects.