A writer is crafting an argument in favor of lowering the age to get a driver’s license in their state to 14 years of age. Which evidence would give the most credible and reliable support for this argument?(1 point) Responses A local woman who is the mother of three children says that she wishes her 14-year-old daughter could drive in order to help her with her errands. A local woman who is the mother of three children says that she wishes her 14-year-old daughter could drive in order to help her with her errands. A national news broadcast reports that in South Dakota, teenagers as young as 14 years old can receive their restricted driver’s permits. A national news broadcast reports that in South Dakota, teenagers as young as 14 years old can receive their restricted driver’s permits. An older man from a rural area states that he learned to drive at the age of seven and has never been in an accident or even received a citation. An older man from a rural area states that he learned to drive at the age of seven and has never been in an accident or even received a citation. A professor of driving science recently observed that younger drivers have better eyesight and quicker reaction times than older drivers.

1 answer

The most credible and reliable support for the argument in favor of lowering the age to get a driver’s license to 14 years of age would be "A national news broadcast reports that in South Dakota, teenagers as young as 14 years old can receive their restricted driver’s permits."

This piece of evidence is strong because it references a specific policy in a state, demonstrating real-world precedent for allowing younger drivers to obtain permits. It implies that there have been successful implementations of such a law, which can help bolster the argument. In contrast, the other responses are primarily anecdotal or subjective in nature and do not provide the same level of objective support.