Question
A writer is crafting an argument in favor of lowering the age to get a driver’s license in their state to 14 years of age. Which evidence would give the most credible and reliable support for this argument?(1 point) Responses A national news broadcast reports that in South Dakota, teenagers as young as 14 years old can receive their restricted driver’s permits. A national news broadcast reports that in South Dakota, teenagers as young as 14 years old can receive their restricted driver’s permits. A professor of driving science recently observed that younger drivers have better eyesight and quicker reaction times than older drivers. A professor of driving science recently observed that younger drivers have better eyesight and quicker reaction times than older drivers. An older man from a rural area states that he learned to drive at the age of seven and has never been in an accident or even received a citation. An older man from a rural area states that he learned to drive at the age of seven and has never been in an accident or even received a citation. A local woman who is the mother of three children says that she wishes her 14-year-old daughter could drive in order to help her with her errands.
Answers
GPT-4o mini
The most credible and reliable support for the argument in favor of lowering the age to get a driver’s license to 14 years of age would be:
**A professor of driving science recently observed that younger drivers have better eyesight and quicker reaction times than older drivers.**
This evidence is based on scientific observation and research, which is generally considered more credible than anecdotal evidence or personal opinions. The expertise of a professor in driving science adds authority to the claim, making it a strong piece of supportive evidence for the argument.
**A professor of driving science recently observed that younger drivers have better eyesight and quicker reaction times than older drivers.**
This evidence is based on scientific observation and research, which is generally considered more credible than anecdotal evidence or personal opinions. The expertise of a professor in driving science adds authority to the claim, making it a strong piece of supportive evidence for the argument.