A writer is crafting an argument in favor of lowering the age to get a driver’s license in their state to 14 years of age. Which evidence would give the most credible and reliable support for this argument?(1 point) Responses A professor of driving science recently observed that younger drivers have better eyesight and quicker reaction times than older drivers. A professor of driving science recently observed that younger drivers have better eyesight and quicker reaction times than older drivers. A local woman who is the mother of three children says that she wishes her 14-year-old daughter could drive in order to help her with her errands. A local woman who is the mother of three children says that she wishes her 14-year-old daughter could drive in order to help her with her errands. An older man from a rural area states that he learned to drive at the age of seven and has never been in an accident or even received a citation. An older man from a rural area states that he learned to drive at the age of seven and has never been in an accident or even received a citation. A national news broadcast reports that in South Dakota, teenagers as young as 14 years old can receive their restricted driver’s permits.

1 answer

The most credible and reliable evidence to support the argument for lowering the age to obtain a driver’s license to 14 years of age is:

A national news broadcast reports that in South Dakota, teenagers as young as 14 years old can receive their restricted driver’s permits.

This piece of evidence is credible because it references a legitimate news source and provides an example of a state where such a policy is already in place. It suggests that there may be a valid precedent for allowing younger individuals to drive, potentially supporting the argument for similar changes in the writer's state.