A writer is crafting an argument in favor of lowering the age to get a driver’s license in their state to 14 years of age. Which evidence would give the most credible and reliable support for this argument?(1 point)

Responses

A professor of driving science recently observed that younger drivers have better eyesight and quicker reaction times than older drivers.
A professor of driving science recently observed that younger drivers have better eyesight and quicker reaction times than older drivers.

An older man from a rural area states that he learned to drive at the age of seven and has never been in an accident or even received a citation.
An older man from a rural area states that he learned to drive at the age of seven and has never been in an accident or even received a citation.

A national news broadcast reports that in South Dakota, teenagers as young as 14 years old can receive their restricted driver’s permits.
A national news broadcast reports that in South Dakota, teenagers as young as 14 years old can receive their restricted driver’s permits.

A local woman who is the mother of three children says that she wishes her 14-year-old daughter could drive in order to help her with her errands.
A local woman who is the mother of three children says that she wishes her 14-year-old daughter could drive in order to help her with her errands.

1 answer

The most credible and reliable support for the argument in favor of lowering the age to get a driver's license to 14 years of age would be:

A national news broadcast reports that in South Dakota, teenagers as young as 14 years old can receive their restricted driver’s permits.

This evidence presents a factual statement about the laws in another state, highlighting a precedent that could support the argument. It provides a broader context and demonstrates that there is a legal framework in place for younger drivers, which could be persuasive in advocating for similar changes.