A writer is crafting an argument in favor of lowering the age to get a driver’s license in their state to 14 years of age. Which evidence would give the most credible and reliable support for this argument?(1 point)

Responses

An older man from a rural area states that he learned to drive at the age of seven and has never been in an accident or even received a citation.
An older man from a rural area states that he learned to drive at the age of seven and has never been in an accident or even received a citation.

A local woman who is the mother of three children says that she wishes her 14-year-old daughter could drive in order to help her with her errands.
A local woman who is the mother of three children says that she wishes her 14-year-old daughter could drive in order to help her with her errands.

A national news broadcast reports that in South Dakota, teenagers as young as 14 years old can receive their restricted driver’s permits.
A national news broadcast reports that in South Dakota, teenagers as young as 14 years old can receive their restricted driver’s permits.

A professor of driving science recently observed that younger drivers have better eyesight and quicker reaction times than older drivers.

1 answer

The most credible and reliable support for the argument in favor of lowering the age to get a driver’s license to 14 years of age would be:

A national news broadcast reports that in South Dakota, teenagers as young as 14 years old can receive their restricted driver’s permits.

This evidence is credible because it refers to an established law in another state, reflecting a practical example of a similar policy. It also suggests that this practice has been deemed acceptable and potentially successful, providing a concrete basis for the argument rather than personal anecdotes or opinions.