Question

A writer is crafting an argument in favor of lowering the age to get a driver’s license in their state to 14 years of age. Which evidence would give the most credible and reliable support for this argument?(1 point) Responses A professor of driving science recently observed that younger drivers have better eyesight and quicker reaction times than older drivers. A professor of driving science recently observed that younger drivers have better eyesight and quicker reaction times than older drivers. A local woman who is the mother of three children says that she wishes her 14-year-old daughter could drive in order to help her with her errands. A local woman who is the mother of three children says that she wishes her 14-year-old daughter could drive in order to help her with her errands. A national news broadcast reports that in South Dakota, teenagers as young as 14 years old can receive their restricted driver’s permits. A national news broadcast reports that in South Dakota, teenagers as young as 14 years old can receive their restricted driver’s permits. An older man from a rural area states that he learned to drive at the age of seven and has never been in an accident or even received a citation.

Answer 1

The most credible and reliable support for the argument in favor of lowering the age to get a driver’s license to 14 years of age would be: **A national news broadcast reports that in South Dakota, teenagers as young as 14 years old can receive their restricted driver’s permits.**

This evidence is credible because it relates to current legislation in a specific state, indicating that there are places where 14-year-olds are allowed to drive under certain conditions. It provides a factual basis for the argument by showing that lowering the age may already be functioning effectively in some regions. The other options, while they may provide personal anecdotes or observations, do not have the same level of credibility or generalizability.