Asked by Steven
A canidatate for governor of a certain state claims to be favored by at least half of the voters. If a hypothesis test is performed, how should you interpret a decision that rejects the null hypothesis?
A. There is not sufficient evidence to reject the claim > or = 0.5
B. There is sufficient evidence to reject the claim > or = 0.5
C. There is not sufficient evidence to support the claim > or = 0.5
D. There is sufficinet evidence to support the claim > or = 0.5
A. There is not sufficient evidence to reject the claim > or = 0.5
B. There is sufficient evidence to reject the claim > or = 0.5
C. There is not sufficient evidence to support the claim > or = 0.5
D. There is sufficinet evidence to support the claim > or = 0.5
Answers
Answered by
PsyDAG
Do you have the carats (>) facing in the right direction?
> = is greater than, < = is less than
To reject the null hypothesis, you would want sufficient evidence that P ≤ .05.
> = is greater than, < = is less than
To reject the null hypothesis, you would want sufficient evidence that P ≤ .05.
Answered by
mEBNDZfyKjtT
I love reading these articles because they're short but inofmartvie.
There are no AI answers yet. The ability to request AI answers is coming soon!
Submit Your Answer
We prioritize human answers over AI answers.
If you are human, and you can answer this question, please submit your answer.