Question
How to start an introduction when you have read two arguments and need to choose which side you're on?
Answers
Answer
About tests
Answered by
GPT-4o mini
When crafting an introduction for an essay or discussion where you've read two arguments and need to choose a side, it's essential to establish context, briefly summarize the opposing views, and clearly state your position. Here’s a structured approach to starting your introduction:
1. **Engage the Reader**: Start with a hook that grabs the reader's attention. This could be a provocative question, a relevant quote, or a surprising statistic related to the topic.
2. **Provide Context**: Briefly introduce the topic at hand to provide background information. Explain why this debate is relevant or important, which helps to situate your discussion.
3. **Summarize the Arguments**: Give a concise overview of the two main arguments or sides of the debate. This should highlight the key points of each perspective without going into too much detail.
4. **State Your Position**: Clearly articulate your stance on the issue. This can be done through a thesis statement that reflects your viewpoint and outlines the reasons for your choice.
Here’s an example framework that incorporates these elements:
---
**Introduction Example:**
In an era where environmental sustainability competes with technological advancement, the debate over the necessity of strict regulations on industrial emissions has gained prominence. Proponents of stringent regulations argue that they are essential for protecting public health and combating climate change, while opponents claim that such measures stifle economic growth and innovation. After careful consideration of both arguments, I align myself with the perspective that strict regulations are not only necessary for safeguarding our planet but also for promoting long-term economic stability. This essay will explore the critical reasons behind this stance, focusing on the health benefits of reduced emissions, the potential for technological innovation, and the moral obligation to preserve the environment for future generations.
---
By following this structure, you ensure that your introduction is engaging, informative, and sets the stage for your argument.
1. **Engage the Reader**: Start with a hook that grabs the reader's attention. This could be a provocative question, a relevant quote, or a surprising statistic related to the topic.
2. **Provide Context**: Briefly introduce the topic at hand to provide background information. Explain why this debate is relevant or important, which helps to situate your discussion.
3. **Summarize the Arguments**: Give a concise overview of the two main arguments or sides of the debate. This should highlight the key points of each perspective without going into too much detail.
4. **State Your Position**: Clearly articulate your stance on the issue. This can be done through a thesis statement that reflects your viewpoint and outlines the reasons for your choice.
Here’s an example framework that incorporates these elements:
---
**Introduction Example:**
In an era where environmental sustainability competes with technological advancement, the debate over the necessity of strict regulations on industrial emissions has gained prominence. Proponents of stringent regulations argue that they are essential for protecting public health and combating climate change, while opponents claim that such measures stifle economic growth and innovation. After careful consideration of both arguments, I align myself with the perspective that strict regulations are not only necessary for safeguarding our planet but also for promoting long-term economic stability. This essay will explore the critical reasons behind this stance, focusing on the health benefits of reduced emissions, the potential for technological innovation, and the moral obligation to preserve the environment for future generations.
---
By following this structure, you ensure that your introduction is engaging, informative, and sets the stage for your argument.