Question

Write 5 well written sentences comparing your results from the 2 tests. Did you notice any inconsistencies between the results? For example, did you have a high interest in a career field that is math related but did not do well on the numerical questions from the aptitude test?


Science - 66.67%
Careers to consider: Biologist, Physicist, Marine Biologist
Culinary- 58.33%
Careers to consider: baker, chef, food scientist
Legal- 41.67%
Careers to consider: judge, lawyer, mediator


Record your results from the Aptitude Test here.
Overall Score: 54%
How many did you get correct? 8
How many were wrong?7
Time used and Time left. 10:29 used 1:31 left
Provide your scores by category. Number Series: 100%, Numerical Word Problems: 50%, Deductive Reasoning: 100%, Analogy: 50%, Inductive Reasoning: 50%, Spatial Ability: 50%, Abstract Reasoning: 50%, Word Relationships: 0%, Deductive Reasoning: 0%, Number Rows: 100%

Answer 1

Upon reviewing the results from the two tests, I observed some notable inconsistencies that warrant reflection. My strong performance in the Science category (66.67%) suggests an inclination towards fields such as biology and physics; however, my overall score on the aptitude test (54%) indicates areas needing improvement. Specifically, while I excelled in the Number Series and Deductive Reasoning sections, scoring 100% in both, my performance in Word Relationships and Numerical Word Problems was significantly weaker, at 0% and 50%, respectively. This disparity raises questions about my potential fit for math-related careers, particularly since my interest aligns with science, which often requires strong quantitative skills. Ultimately, the mixed results imply that while I have a passion for science, my current aptitude in certain numerical areas might limit my career options in those fields.