To determine the best update to the design for longer trips, we need to consider the performance of the temperature-control pack over extended periods. Since the initial test showed that the temperature inside the box is within the desired range for one hour but too hot for two hours, the goal is to improve heat absorption for longer durations.
Here's an analysis of the options:
A. She can make a larger temperature-control pack using less of the same chemical.
- Making a larger pack with less of the chemical does not necessarily mean it will be more effective in controlling temperature. It may not absorb as much heat, which would not alleviate the temperature issue for longer trips.
B. She can make a smaller temperature-control pack using less of the same chemical.
- A smaller pack would likely have even less capacity to absorb heat, making it worse for temperature control.
C. She can add a second temperature-control pack that is identical to the first pack to the box.
- Adding a second identical pack should improve heat absorption, as both packs can work together to maintain a cooler temperature for a longer duration.
D. She can add a second temperature-control pack with the coldest possible temperature to the box.
- While this option sounds appealing, if she adds a pack that releases heat instead of absorbing it, it might not help. The focus should be on packs that cool or absorb heat.
Given these considerations, the most effective design update for longer trips would be:
C. She can add a second temperature-control pack that is identical to the first pack to the box.
This would enhance the cooling effect and help maintain the desired temperature for the duration of the trip.