The most accurate description of Rashid’s work is:
Rashid multiplied with the reciprocal of the dividend instead of the reciprocal of the divisor.
In his work, Rashid correctly started with "three-fourths divided by 9," which he should have expressed as \( \frac{3}{4} \div 9 \). According to the rule of "multiply by the reciprocal," he should have multiplied \( \frac{3}{4} \) by the reciprocal of 9 (which is \( \frac{1}{9} \)), not the reciprocal of the dividend. Instead, he mistakenly represented 9 as \( \frac{1}{9} \), and his work does not show he properly handled the division by multiplying by the reciprocal of the divisor.
Correctly, it should have been:
\[ \frac{3}{4} \div 9 = \frac{3}{4} \times \frac{1}{9} = \frac{3}{36} = \frac{1}{12} \]
Rashid's answer is correct, but the description of his method is inaccurate as he misidentified what he multiplied.