The most accurate description of Rashid's work is: Rashid multiplied with the reciprocal of the dividend instead of the reciprocal of the divisor.
In division of fractions, the correct approach is to multiply the first fraction (the dividend) by the reciprocal of the second fraction (the divisor). In this case, the correct operation for
So although he used the rule of multiplying by the reciprocal correctly, he didn't apply the correct reciprocal in relation to the question.