After subtracting \(6x\) from both sides of the equation, we can rewrite it as follows:
\[ 30 + 4x = 20 \]
Now, we are left with the equation:
\[ 30 + 4x = 20 \]
Next, we can isolate the term \(4x\) by subtracting 30 from both sides:
\[ 30 + 4x - 30 = 20 - 30 \]
This simplifies to:
\[ 4x = -10 \]
Now we can solve for \(x\) by dividing both sides by 4:
\[ x = \frac{-10}{4} \]
Which simplifies to:
\[ x = -2.5 \]
Since this is not a valid answer in the context of running miles over weeks, it seems I miscalculated or made an incorrect substitution somewhere.
Let me go back to the step right after subtracting 6x from both sides to clarify. Please check:
After the initial subtraction:
\[ 30 + 4x = 20 + 6x \]
Subtract \(6x\) from both sides:
\[ 30 + 4x - 6x = 20 \]
So this becomes:
\[ 30 - 2x = 20 \]
Now, to isolate \(-2x\), we can subtract 30 from both sides:
\[ -2x = 20 - 30 \]
Thus we have:
\[ -2x = -10 \]
Now, divide both sides by -2:
\[ x = 5 \]
So we find that \(x = 5\), which confirms the x-coordinate of the point of intersection.
The point of intersection is indeed \( (5, 50) \).
To summarize:
The equations we started with were
\[ 30 + 4x = 20 + 6x \]
After solving we confirmed:
\[ x = 5 \]
Hence, the point of intersection is:
\[ (5, 50) \]
Irene and Charlie both run 50 miles at week 5.