Duplicate Question
The question on this page has been marked as a duplicate question.
Original Question
While hiking, Marek throws a rock off a cliff that is roughly 10 meters above a lake. This situation is modeled by the equation...Asked by silly master !! :3
While hiking, Marek throws a rock off a cliff that is roughly 10 meters above a lake. This situation is modeled by the equation h=−4.9t^2 +10 , with h representing the height in meters and t the time in seconds. If you were to set up a table to determine when the rock hits the water, what would be a reasonable scale for the range?
a. 5
b. 1/10
c. 2
d. 10
a. 5
b. 1/10
c. 2
d. 10
Answers
There are no human answers yet.
Answered by
GPT-4o mini
To determine when the rock hits the water, we need to find the time \( t \) when the height \( h \) is zero (i.e., when the rock reaches the lake's surface).
The equation given is:
\[ h = -4.9t^2 + 10 \]
To find when the rock hits the water, we set \( h = 0 \):
\[ 0 = -4.9t^2 + 10 \]
Rearranging gives:
\[ 4.9t^2 = 10 \]
Dividing both sides by 4.9:
\[ t^2 = \frac{10}{4.9} \approx 2.0408 \]
Taking the square root:
\[ t \approx \sqrt{2.0408} \approx 1.43 \, seconds \]
Now, we can consider reasonable scales for the range of \( t \). Given that we want to generate a table for \( t \), we should include values around 0 and up to around 1.5 seconds.
Let's evaluate the options for the scale:
- a. **5** - This would result in a very large range unnecessarily since values like 5 seconds are far beyond when the rock will hit the water.
- b. **1/10** - This scale (0.1) would provide very detailed increments, allowing us to capture the moment the rock hits the water accurately.
- c. **2** - This could fit, but 2 seconds is still larger than the actual time we calculated (1.43 seconds).
- d. **10** - Similar to option A, this scale is much too large; we won't need such a range of time.
Given these evaluations, **the best reasonable scale for the range is b. 1/10**, allowing for a detailed view of the rock's descent and the time it hits the water.
The equation given is:
\[ h = -4.9t^2 + 10 \]
To find when the rock hits the water, we set \( h = 0 \):
\[ 0 = -4.9t^2 + 10 \]
Rearranging gives:
\[ 4.9t^2 = 10 \]
Dividing both sides by 4.9:
\[ t^2 = \frac{10}{4.9} \approx 2.0408 \]
Taking the square root:
\[ t \approx \sqrt{2.0408} \approx 1.43 \, seconds \]
Now, we can consider reasonable scales for the range of \( t \). Given that we want to generate a table for \( t \), we should include values around 0 and up to around 1.5 seconds.
Let's evaluate the options for the scale:
- a. **5** - This would result in a very large range unnecessarily since values like 5 seconds are far beyond when the rock will hit the water.
- b. **1/10** - This scale (0.1) would provide very detailed increments, allowing us to capture the moment the rock hits the water accurately.
- c. **2** - This could fit, but 2 seconds is still larger than the actual time we calculated (1.43 seconds).
- d. **10** - Similar to option A, this scale is much too large; we won't need such a range of time.
Given these evaluations, **the best reasonable scale for the range is b. 1/10**, allowing for a detailed view of the rock's descent and the time it hits the water.
Submit Your Answer
We prioritize human answers over AI answers.
If you are human, and you can answer this question, please submit your answer.