Marcelo reviewed the presentation and made the following claim:

Synthetic materials should be banned because they only negatively impact humans and the environment.

Which piece of evidence would be best used to argue against Marcelo's claim (rebuttal)?

(1 point)
Responses

Synthetic materials are used in knee replacements that help people walk.
Synthetic materials are used in knee replacements that help people walk.

Synthetic materials take longer to break down in a landfill.
Synthetic materials take longer to break down in a landfill.

Natural materials are easier to find.
Natural materials are easier to find.

Producing synthetic materials usually requires burning fossil fuels.
Producing synthetic materials usually requires burning fossil fuels.

1 answer

The best piece of evidence to argue against Marcelo's claim would be:

Synthetic materials are used in knee replacements that help people walk.

This evidence highlights a positive impact of synthetic materials on human health and wellbeing, directly countering Marcelo's assertion that they only negatively impact humans.

Similar Questions
  1. Marcelo reviewed the presentation and made the following claim:Synthetic materials should be banned because they only negatively
    1. answers icon 1 answer
    1. answers icon 1 answer
  2. Marcelo reviewed the presentation and made the following claim:Synthetic materials should be banned because they only negatively
    1. answers icon 1 answer
  3. which of the following is NOT true about synthetic materials?A. synthetic materials can have positive and negative impacts on
    1. answers icon 1 answer
more similar questions