Marcelo reviewed the presentation and made the following claim:Synthetic materials should be banned because they only negatively impact humans and the environment.Which piece of evidence would be best used to argue against Marcelo's claim (rebuttal)?(1 point)ResponsesSynthetic materials are used in knee replacements that help people walk.Synthetic materials are used in knee replacements that help people walk.Synthetic materials take longer to break down in a landfill.Synthetic materials take longer to break down in a landfill.Producing synthetic materials usually requires burning fossil fuels.Producing synthetic materials usually requires burning fossil fuels.Natural materials are easier to find.
1 answer
The best piece of evidence to argue against Marcelo's claim is: Synthetic materials are used in knee replacements that help people walk.
This evidence highlights a positive impact of synthetic materials on human life, demonstrating that they can provide significant benefits in medical applications, thereby countering the assertion that they only have negative effects.
